This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
A production section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section discusses the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, award nominations, and insights into the casting and staffing where possible.
A response section needs to be added to this article, or the current one needs to be expanded. This section should be well cited using neutral and reliable sources that discuss the reaction of both critics and the viewing audience to the show. Additionally, document any impact the show has had on society, and merchandise that may have resulted from the show, such as toys, games, etc.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
In general, citing sources is a good thing, but having the same citation ("(Kemper, et al., 1989)") at the end of every single paragraph would be overkill under any circumstances, and in this case, when the article is _about_ the episode, and says so in the first sentence, it hardly seems necessary to have inline citations of the episode itself. It should be cited in the References section, obviously, but I'm removing the needless and repetetive inline citations. --Jonadab, 2006 Mar 30
Think we should have the summary in screen-order. Putting things in internal chronological order may make it easier to comprehend the "plot", but it completely destroys the dramatic structure (see Memento (film) for example). Morwen - Talk13:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]