This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rusyns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rusyns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RusynsWikipedia:WikiProject RusynsTemplate:WikiProject RusynsRusyns
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
There is clearly consensus against including "Old Ukrainian". In that discussion, you were already told this, as per the many previous discussions. Shevelov was for example mentioned at Talk:Old_East_Slavic/Archive_2#Removing_"Old_Russian". As I already mentioned in the edit summary, Shevelov only uses "Old Ukrainian" in reference to the history of the Ukrainian language. For this subject, which he calls a "hypothetical uniform language", he uses Common Russian/Common Eastern Slavic. This is already mentioned in the article. Mellk (talk) 23:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the last discussion, no one aside from yourself supported such changes. You also misrepresented the source, and this is the same thing with Shevelov. As you were already told when you started the last discussion: I don’t see that you’re offering any new arguments... The fact is that the name “Old Russian” is widely used in English, while the name “Old Ukrainian” is not. If you are not making any new arguments here, then simply starting a new discussion about this is not going to help. Mellk (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything about Old Ukrainian in previous discussion.
Are you seriously trying to tell me that this discussion has nothing to do with "Old Ukrainian"?
Again, he gives this chronology in A Historical Phonology of the Ukrainian Language (1979), which also includes "Proto-Ukrainian" up to the 11th century, followed by "Old Ukrainian" then "Middle Ukrainian" and so on. "Old Ukrainian" in general usually refers a specific dialect from the 15/16th centuries. This is misrepresenting the source, plain and simple. Mellk (talk) 06:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion is archived, how am I supposed to know this?
Yeah, he does, and therefore it should be addressed in the article. You literally confirmed that he uses Old Ukrainian and Middle Ukrainian, and still "This is misrepresenting the source", really?
Same thing about old russain, quote:"Old Russian is also used to describe the written language in Russia until the 18th century". Shahray (talk) 06:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This was already linked in this discussion. The talk page banner also has links to the archives since talk page discussions are automatically archived.
It should not be addressed in this article, because the source refers to Ukrainian phonology, not this subject. That belongs to the article about the Ukrainian language or perhaps Ukrainian phonology. What Shevelov has said about the subject is already mentioned in this article. Mellk (talk) 06:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]