Jump to content

User talk:Spinboy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to the talk page of Spinboy
To ensure that your communication is received in order and replied to, a certain code of conduct must be followed -- which for most people goes without saying and it is not neccesary to state this, but for some it is unfortunately required -- please ensure that you do the following: -
  • sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
  • post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
  • use headlines when starting new talk topics by inserting ==Subject==
  • be signed in, all messages by anonymous users will be disregarded. Register or sign in here.
  • attempt to use proper spelling and grammar to convey your message accurately and concisely.
  • I respond to comments left on my talk page on your talk page.
Start a new talk topic.

Wikihug

[edit]

Here is a Wikihug because I have seen many of your contributions and you are a great user; I still want you on Wikipedia and I know I'm not the only one. ♥♥purplefeltangel 21:28, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - including me. --Celestianpower háblame 21:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes when an editor leaves, one is happy to be rid of him or her so that the rest of us can get on with building an encyclopedia without having to deal with that person's disruption. I can think of one editor who was banned recently about whom I feel that way. You and I had a very aggravating dispute a while ago, and I do not respect how you handled that situation, so I have been avoiding interacting with you. I do recognize, however, that you make valuable contributions. I know that a lot of people opposed your nomination for administrator, but that does not mean that they oppose you as an editor. A large number of people took the time to support your nomination because they value your contributions. We are working on a great project here, so I encourage you to reconsider. Take some time off if you need it, but after that, please come back. Ground Zero | t 22:44, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Go!

[edit]

I had my own I felt like leaving episode, and looking back I feel pretty silly about it, I think your alllll right! Wikipedia is about writing articles, I just imagine what this encycolpedia will be like 100 years from now, and how great every article will be.--Cloveious 16:53, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nooooooooooo!!

[edit]

Please don't leave! I appreciate you and I know I'm not the only one. Don't let an RFA get you down. From what I see, those can be really brutal. Really, please come back, you do a lot of good work! HGB 18:48, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Back I say!

[edit]

Come back peeeeeeasssseeee!!! --Romeo Bravo =/\= 23:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dont leave...

[edit]

Please don't leave you taught me how to do add my name to comments with a link and time. please donlt leave Zhanster 08:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Even though you dont know me, I know you by your great contribs to this place. Please stick around, wikipedia needs you! Come on back soon, hey? Banes 09:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Don't go - take some air and then come back - the sentiments here show you are appreciated and wanted ! :) Brookie: A collector of little round things 16:37, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yo, remember me? we had our own arguments around this time last year when I first started on wiki. Well you might have noticed than I've been inactive for a while, but I still make occasional edits. The problem is, with a project like this, unless it is your job, you DON'T have to treat it like one. Just take a casual approach. Take a well-deserved break, and don't come back unless you feel like it. Peace. LG-犬夜叉 22:53, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

[edit]

I have removed you request for comment on Anakinskywalker, because it was not certified by two users who had failed to resolve the dispute earlier. Radiant_>|< 00:00, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We need you!

[edit]

WikiProject Ottawa, and wikipedia itself need you! Please come back soon. --Someones life 00:36, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't give up

[edit]

I know you don't know me but I feel that way sometimes too. You've done a good job. We all get disgusted and feel unwanted. Take a good break and come back..User:DakotaKahn 02:09, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No one said that you are not wanted on wiki * (if any people did not counting vandals) --Adam1213 Talk 16:24, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

<3

[edit]

Come back, or I'll throw the biggest motherfucking hissy fit you'll ever see.  :) Jachin 02:07, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay!

[edit]

You're appreciated, trust me.--SarekOfVulcan 01:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here Here

[edit]

You are needed FullSmash26 03:30, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Take care

[edit]

Laddie, it's been a pleasure. Take care of yourself; come back and visit some time if you don't come back and stay for good. Drop a note next time you're back, eh? Have a good one, and many more. Yours, Blackcap (talk) 07:14, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lightbringer Arbitration case

[edit]

The Arbitration case against Lightbringer, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lightbringer, to which you contributed, has closed. The decision is that Lightbringer is hereby banned indefinitely from editing articles and talk-pages related to Freemasonry (the closeness of the relation is to be interpretted by any sysop as they see fit, regardless of the article's title), and is placed on personal attack parole for six months from now (to expire on the 24 of May 2006). If Lightbringer violates the Freemasonry ban, a sysop may ban them for up to a week, and after five such bans, for up to a year. If they violate the personal attack parole, a sysop may ban them for up to a week.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 00:03, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User categorisation

[edit]

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians by alma mater page. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians by alma mater for instructions. --Cooksey 21:50, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good to have you back

[edit]

It is good to have you back! FullSmash26 20:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You should stay. You have done an amazing job on Wiki especially with all the Student Organizations. You would not believe the number of people who use it as a resource to find out and link to Student Organizations. I get frustrated as well, especially on the CFS article as the CFS is constantly reverting and changing the article but you are letting them win by leaving. FullSmash26 22:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:PC

[edit]

Template:PC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:PC. Thank you. Aecis praatpaal 00:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC) (I'm sorry I didn't inform you earlier)[reply]

I see that you've already cast your vote :s Aecis praatpaal 00:26, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Problem @ Concordia Page

[edit]

Hi, an anononymous user has been continually reverting the student activism section of the page without any comment to a version that is completely POV. I've tried repeatedely to suggest that s/he discuss it but to no avail. Is there anything I can do besides continuing this RV war? thanks djheart 05:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC) --- Just looked up at previous comments and have realized that you may have quit, sorry for the intrusion, if you cannot help me can you refer me to someone who can? thanks.

Staying On

[edit]

Just saw your departure note - I'm glad you decided to stay on. Even though we seem to disagree on almost everything (I don't recall ever seeing us have the same vote on anything), ... actually, it's probably because we disgree so much that I find it good to have you still participating. The diversity of perspectives on Wikipedia is it's core strength (even if we do severely annoy each other from time to time :-) Thanks for staying and contributing! --GrantNeufeld 04:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sad to hear you're not actually staying. Good luck with your future endeavours! --GrantNeufeld 06:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Cell Template

[edit]

Care to mention why you reverted my edit? --Romeo Bravo 18:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a broadcast message for users that voted to select this article as the Canadian collaboration. It has been selected for the January 2006 collaboration period. Congratulations, and happy editing! Mindmatrix 17:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Can passport2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. -- Longhair 15:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Participant alert regarding Wikiproject on Advertising

[edit]

The Wikiproject No Ads, created as a backlash against the Answers.com deal, has served an important function in providing a space for users to express their disagreement with the Foundation proposal. While the current controversies about userboxes raise questions about political and social advocacy on Wikipedia, there should be greater flexibility regarding advocacy about Wikipedia in the Wikipedia namespace. Reported and linked by Slashdot and other press sources as a unique and spontaneous occurence in Wikipedia history, it has apparently had some impact as, despite being scheduled to begin in January, not a peep has been heard about the trial and proposed sponsored link since the deal's controversial announcement months ago. Currently, however, there is an attempt to delete the project or move it off Wikipedia altogether. Since the Foundation has provided no additional information and has not attempted to answer the specific questions that participants in the project raised, it is unclear if the Answers.com deal has been abandoned or simply delayed. Until the situation becomes more clear, I believe the group should still have a place in the Wikipedia namespace. Sincerely, Tfine80 00:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Algonquin-plaque.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SteinbDJ 01:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

[edit]

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

  1. If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
  2. If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
  3. Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 02:46, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cf-health-center.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Reform

[edit]

Wikipedia began as an open effort to create an encyclopedia of the people, by the people, for the people. Sadly, its bureaucracy has put an end to those goals. To this end, we must promote a peaceful revolution to reform it. We must eliminate the undue influence of certain people and remake Wikipedia as a people's encyclopedia. We, the reformers, are led by TJWhite who endured only briefly before suffering an indefinite block. Visit his user page to see our ideology, roughly outlined. I for one do not condone his call to vandalism. Instead, by using the power of the people, we can reform wikipedia. Join us to recreate an encyclopedia where all are equal; an encyclopedia that does not strive to become Brittannica, but rather seeks to be a one of kind encyclopedia for all of the people of the world. Please pass this message in some form to as many people as you can. Secondly, petition for the unblock of TJWhite, the one who began our glorious movement. Finally, link to his page from your user page and express your sentiments for reform on your page. Thank You, fellow wikipedians. LaRevolution 15:34, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Can passport1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 17:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't leave, We want you here

[edit]
                            b,                                                 
                           JPQ,                                                
                         .dP'd|._,=====\__                                     
                        xdP  #P"'     _,d##b_                                  
                     .d/"    '     `?#:;"""""'                                 
                   ,pP'                `#_                                     
                 ,d"        .,-qx_,     `QL                                    
               d/'        ,/"'   "\:      3L_                                  
             ,/"        ./'            ./"  `\_                                
            dP         :/   .,,===-x_  `      Q|                               
          .d'          ` .,/"       `\L .x--__|#                               
         ./'            /"            `#"    "Q#                               
        .d'           ,"               `b      ]_                              
        d'          ./'                 !L      ]|                             
       JP           J                    ]       b                             
       #'          j'                    ||      ]|                            
      |P           |                      |      ||                            
      ||          |'                      #      ||                            
      d|          #                       #      ||                            
      #|         ||                       P      |!                            
      ||         ||                      :|      #                             
      `b_xdp====bdb,                     |'     :|                             
   .,p/""         ``b_     jd##:         d##L   db`"`"#:                       
.x/"'                `?L, |####b        |####  d'     #|                       
jP'                     ``\d####P       ,/?Q##.d[,----``'=\_                    
Q:             ._,x,--q_,  "?##P'    _x-"   ;:""'          Qb                   
`#b_,     `""""""`"`=_        """"""""   :-"       _,-r-'.,dP                   
 ``?=x__             `b,                       _dd,===##P""                    
      """?=\xx___      `q_,                  ,/"'                              
             `"""""""""""?Qpq,            .,/'                                 
                           ?b""=qx_   .,,`"                                    
                            !#_      ][                                        
                             3#q,     ]b                                       
                         ._x#P\,"\_    `?\_,                                   
              .,x######p#P""'  \  `'\,    ?##'                                 
          /b d""'              `|    `-=___Jbx+,                               
         J!`\|                 :|         ""' !|                               
        |P  `?b,__,,           d              d!                               
       _d'   ``"?=Q[""""'p-  ./'            .d[                                
      |PQ          QL    ]=,="             ./"                                 
      !b           `]b                    ./'                                  
       QL            `\x,                :P                                    
       `#,   .         `?\_              |'                                    
        `Q:  `\_          `?qx_,         |                                     
         `QL  |P\_,          ``""==bxxx__#                                     
           "\,|| ``=\x__           ,#P"`""                                     
             `Qb      ]#"     ._x#/"                                           
               #:     ##==##=P""']|                                            
               ]|     #|  `Q:     ?L                                           
                b,    #|    Q_     ]b,                                         
                ]L    Q|     ]L     `\_                                        
                `Q,   !#      `\,     `b------------qxxxxx___                  
                 Jb    Q        ]=                       `""""`"-=-x_,         
             .,dP"     `\_      `b_                                 ``"=\x_,   
          .,#P"          `bx,    ``bb__                                   `"\_ 
        ,d#"               `?b_     ``"?qb_                                  "\
     ,d#"'                   ``\_,        ""=x_                     ._______xd#
  .x/"                          `?b,          "'=_,               :r"""""""""' 
 dP'                              `?_             "`=q_________,=="            
 |                             .____#'                 """"""""                
 `"==P"""""\_             _x=/""""`"'                                          
            ``=x______,--""                                                    
                """""'

Don't leave, wI really appreciate your edits. General Eisenhower (talk of my war years) (talk here) (Help ME Improve) (war or Magic) (History here) HI (Espanol) (Military (Victory in World War II) (Rayven) (Need Help?) 01:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have tagged this image with {{PD-ineligible}}. However, it is clear that this tag is not proper. It could be used for say, simple chemical structural formulas, but not for photos! Please read Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. If no proper license will be added in seven days, the image will be re-tagged with {{no source}} and deleted. Please ask on my talk page if you have any questions. Renata 07:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow your own advice?

[edit]

When I first joined, you stuck a nice welcome in my user page. Do you remember what line #2? said? Don't let grumpy users scare you off. There's still plenty to do. Don't be too serious and stop having fun. Stop pouting and come back and play. :) --Markzero 12:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come back for Good

[edit]

You are a great contributer, we need you! FullSmash26 05:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Past AfD nomination of Intercounty Baseball League

[edit]

Just noticed this past AfD and I fully support the decision to keep this article. Anyone familiar with Canadian baseball knows that the IBL is a serious men's baseball league with a long history (since 1919) that has produced several members of Major League Baseball, AAA baseball, AA baseball and A baseball, while also featuring former MLB players and former Negro Leagues players of the past. To delete it would have been a travesty. Additionally, several former IBL players have been inducted into the Canadian Baseball Hall of Fame & Museum in St. Marys, Ontario. Barry Wells 16:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above AfD nomination, I'd like to add that the IBL has had numerous former MLB players in the league, including Fergie Jenkins (who's the only player to have been inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame and the Canadian Baseball Hall of Fame), Frank Colman, Denny McLain, Dave Rozema, Paul Spoljaric, Rob Butler, Oscar Judd, Tim Burgess, Mike Kilkenny and several outstanding former Negro Leagues players.
Additionally, many many players have been paid to play (albeit under the table), the league has many corporate sponsors, fans, competent, paid umpires, an official media guy, statistician, record books, commissioner and local TV contracts. It is serious baseball, with most parks (all but one, I believe) charging admission. The 1948 London Majors not only won the Intercounty title, but also the Ontario title, the Canadian title and the Can-Am title. Drinking beer while playing is not permitted, as one user frivously suggested. Many former IBL players have also gone on to baseball scholarships at U.S. universities, pro careers with MLB organizations or AAA ball, AA ball or A ball. The London Majors play at Labatt Park, the undisputed (to date) world's oldest baseball grounds in continuous use since 1877 (a heritage site under the Ontario Heritage Act) -- a park which won the prestigious Beam Clay Award as the best natural grass baseball park in North America in 1989-90. Barry Wells 19:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Canadapost hq.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Canadapost hq.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 17:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed this article for deletion (along with a number of other Windsor-related articles; see my list of contributions if you care about the others). In this case, I believe that student organizations are generally covered in the Wikipedia article on their university, unless they are particularly notable - and this one does not seem to be so. For the same reason, I proposed The Lance. If you disagree, please feel free to remove my prod and either improve the articles to show why they should exist, or else argue on the talk pages that they are fine the way they are. --Brianyoumans 02:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Aufront.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aufront.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Sherool (talk) 13:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doug jeanc.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Doug jeanc.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok 04:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as "Club Z") are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —Pilotguy (ptt) 03:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

[edit]

Hey, Spinboy, I know you've left but I've been finding your massive contributions to LGBT articles right, left and center, so, if you do ever come back, you are warmly invited to join WikiProject LGBT studies. Hope you'll join someday. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 03:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Busulogo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Busulogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article World Service Authority, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. A. B. (talk) 16:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Asu logo.gif

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Asu logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ulsu logo.gif

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ulsu logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tucows-logo.gif

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tucows-logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ousa logo.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ousa logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pcf.gif

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pcf.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ssmulogo.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ssmulogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Occsb.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Occsb.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Su uc logo.jpg

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Su uc logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ussu logo.gif

[edit]
Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ussu logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 617 (television channel), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 617 (television channel) has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 617 (television channel), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 00:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Aliant logo.gif

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Aliant logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 15:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:NAC-title.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NAC-title.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KipSmithers T/C 09:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:True opening.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:True opening.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Greely Elementary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NAC-title.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NAC-title.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NAC-title.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NAC-title.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. βcommand 04:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pcf.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pcf.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Umanitoba.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Umanitoba.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tru logo.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tru logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Feds2.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Feds2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with a page

[edit]

Hi! I would like to email you about some problems with a page. Would that be possible?

Quirrelly 2-16-08 Quirrelly (talk) 17:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:CanSSM.jpg

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:CanSSM.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:CanSSM.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 06:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Castor Valley Elementary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Hbcr.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 02:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Embassies and High Commissions in Ottawa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Diplomatic missions in Ottawa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Россавиа Диалог 20:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Todaysspecial2.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Todaysspecial2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ottawa hospital logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Airmiles.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Airmiles.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 15:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Todaysspecial.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Todaysspecial.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Brock University Students' Union, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock University Students' Union. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abductive (reasoning) 15:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Executive MBA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MWOAP (talk) 03:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Spinboy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Debbie Travis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Can passport1.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Can passport1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Children's Aid Society (Canada). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's Aid Society (Canada). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Athabasca University Students' Union, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Saskatchewan Students' Union is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Saskatchewan Students' Union until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 01:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Admin's Barnstar
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Queer_Wikimedians Vaclavkrejza (talk) 22:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Commonwealth Universities

[edit]

Category:Commonwealth Universities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryerson Students' Union, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools

[edit]

Category:Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

new page for functions and modules

[edit]

I have created a page in the OpenSCAD user manual which combines functions and modules on the same page. It is at https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/User-Defined_Functions_and_Modules While the redirects will get you there, you may wish to update your link.

By the way, my son was a student at Gallaudet some 30 years ago. Keep up the good work. LABoyd2 (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ottawa hospital logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ottawa hospital logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NS Uni

[edit]

Template:NS Uni has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Graham (talk) 07:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

[edit]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 04:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HBC Rewards Card (2007 version).jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HBC Rewards Card (2007 version).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canadian Automobile Association for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Automobile Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Automobile Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Mehus (talk) 21:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Bank Transitway Station" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bank Transitway Station. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 14#Bank Transitway Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ryerson University people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ryerson University indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Saint Thomas University (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Saint Thomas University (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Saint Thomas University (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article High Commission of New Zealand, Ottawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for 17 years. No coverage to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Canada Customs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 5 § Customs redirects until a consensus is reached. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 03:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Acadia Students' Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Prestige of a parent article does not transfer over. Of the 21 sources linked, 20 are from the university itself with most appearing to come from the union.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wozal (talk) 03:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article St. Francis Xavier University Students' Union has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This lacks any sources and does not appear to be notable on its own. As it stands, this is just a purely promotional piece.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wozal (talk) 04:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]